Tag Archives: at&t

AT&t Buyout of T-Mobile is just wrong

It’s ironic that just a few short years ago, AT&T Wireless as they were called, was at the receiving end of just such a buy-out. Maybe they feel that the public memory is short but we remember why this was so.

[trafficplayer_skin padding: 29px 0 0 70px; margin: 0 auto; width: 574px; height: 412px; background: url(http://businessbymouse.com//wp-content/uploads/skin4_500x325.png)no-repeat top left; text-align: left;][trafficplayer_youtube_video width=”500″ height=”325″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/-9nXwi0VWTw?&autohide=1&autoplay=1&controls=0&hd=1&rel=0&showinfo=0″ ][/trafficplayer_youtube_video][/trafficplayer_skin]AT&T  WAS #3 of 4 in market share and they received that nomination mostly for poor service and the countless dropped calls their customers were forced to endure. Fast-forward to 2011. What do we have? The brand name has re-emerged and now wants to “rule the world” of the Mobile Phone and possible the mobile web itself.

This cannot be allowed to happen. Look around you. Monopolies set the pace for everything the touch. Oil. Manufacturing. Retail, you name it. Okay, so they want to be a part of a duopoly with Verizon, does that diminish their dark goal?

Read what Public Knowledge, a Washington based public interest group has to say about this.

Public Knowledge President & Co-Founder Issues Statement On AT&T/T-Mobile Deal

Posted on 25 May 2011

Mobile Marketing Public Knowledge President & Co Founder Issues Statement On AT&T/T Mobile DealEver since the proposed takeover of T-Mobile by AT&T was announced there’s been harsh opposition to the merger, mostly having to do with consumer choice and anti-competition fears.

Public Knowledge, a Washington D.C. based public interest group, has long been outspoken when it comes to consumer choice across a wide variety of issues, and the AT&T/T-Mobile deal is no exception.  Public Knowledge President and Co-Founder Gigi B. Sohn criticized the takeover today, saying “It would be hard to imagine a takeover that could do more harm to consumers.”  She spoke at a Capitol Hill press conference hosted by Rep. John Conyers, Jr., the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.  The following is her full statement on the subject:

It would be hard to imagine a takeover that could do more harm to consumers than AT&T buying out its competitor, T-Mobile.  If this deal is allowed, about 80 percent of the market share and 90 percent of the revenue will belong to two companies – AT&T and Verizon.

That’s a great deal for them, a bad deal for consumers.  It will mean higher prices.  As smaller competitors are bought out or squeezed out, the huge companies that are left will be able to raise rates, have stricter caps on data usage and do just about anything an unregulated duopoly feels like doing.

It will mean less innovation.  T-Mobile was the first company to market with the Android phone.  It still has more flexible calling plans than other companies.

Consumers already know this is a bad deal.  As soon as the takeover was announced, Public Knowledge started getting unsolicited email from people all over the country.

One we received just yesterday said:

“I now have T-mobile and I’m very happy with them and to think that AT$T buying us is so wrong!!!   If this deal had happen[ed] in 2008, I would not had the android phone I have now. I know what AT$T’s vision for us now is.  They want to share with us more dropped calls and rude customer service and make us pay more.”

About 5,000 other people like this one have already sent comments to the FCC asking our regulators to stop this takeover.

This transaction is a pivotal moment in U.S. antitrust law.  If that law means anything, this classic merger of one company buying out a smaller competitor in the same business must be denied.  There are no conditions or divestitures that can make this deal acceptable.  This merger is unfixable.

This post was written by:

Justin – who has written 1294 posts on Mobile Marketing Watch.

What’s your opinion? Drop us a line. Let the world know what you think.



Android Takes Over in 2011

We’ve said it before and, guess what? We’ll say it again. Diversity will win over product in the mobile wars. Why would you not believe us? You’ve seen it before. Think PC versus MAC for a minute. This in reality was operating system versus operating system.

PC has won that battle handily. Look, we are believers in making products that can be applied widely and not only on a choice few items. Apple lost the battle before it began when they made a mobile operating system that could only work on their line of products.

Sure, you do belong to an exclusive club when you own an iPhone or an iPad. The problem is that just by the nature of this club, limits are felt all around. Limits on forums, limits on support, tutorials, and ability to dominate the marketplace. The only advantage Apple exercises right now is in the applications marketplace, and that was gained through “seniority”, being around forever.

Here’s what Greg Sterling, a contributing editor at Search Engine Land, has to say about it.

Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56pm ET by Greg Sterling

Tech consulting firm IDC has predicted that Google’s mobile operating system will become the dominant mobile platform this year, achieving a global market share of 39.5 percent. The next in line would be former global leader Nokia with 20.9 percent. Apple comes in at 15.7 percent.

Windows Phones to Overtake Apple (via Nokia)

These figures are very aggressive in terms of Android’s share and Nokia’s decline. But they’re consistent with the remarkable growth that Android has enjoyed over the past year.

By 2015 IDC projects that Google will own 45.4 percent of the global smartphone market. The next largest player would be Windows with 20.9 percent — based on Nokia’s adoption of the Microsoft operating system. If that in fact happens Nokia and Microsoft’s gambit will have paid off.

Interestingly RIM (BlackBerry), just behind Apple at 14.9 percent this year, remains relatively stable through the forecast period, winding up with 13.7 percent of the global market in 2015.

I think these numbers are potentially problematic for the following reasons:

  • RIM is unlikely to be able to maintain its current position unless its next-generation OS (QNX) is radically better.
  • These numbers assume no lower-cost iPhones and only moderate success of the anticipated iPhone 5.
  • They also appear to assume Symbian’s share will simply transfer over to Windows (far from a given)

Windows Phones appear to be selling modestly well, though not in the US market. We’ll have to wait (until 2012 apparently) to see the outcome of the “Nokisoft” collaboration. Microsoft must continue to build its library of apps, which recently crossed the 10K threshold, to maximize its chances of success with Windows Phones.

Right now, in the absence of the Nokisoft phones, there no evidence that IDC’s Windows Phone market share prediction will come true.

Advertising Implications of Android’s Dominance

With a few exceptions Android devices are Google search devices and drive mobile search volumes accordingly. Google dominates mobile search today by a margin the size of the Pacific Ocean (according to StatCounter):

Recently investment firm Macquarie Group put out a research note (using Efficient Frontier data) that showed effectively 97 percent of the US mobile search spend was going to Google.

All of this is browser based search of course. And there are hundreds of millions of mobile queries coming through apps that almost nobody is tracking right now.

Yet Google is overwhelmingly the leader in mobile search share and associated revenue, far exceeding even its dominant position on the PC. In mobile display Google is also the revenue leader in the US, according to IDC — followed by Apple (with iAD) and then Millennial Media.

Too Much Success?

If IDC’s handset sales projections come true Google will continue to enjoy near-total dominance of browser-based mobile search ad revenue, which will run into the billions by 2015. (Google also enjoys search dominance on the iPhone as well.) Its ownership of AdMob will also give it a potentially dominant position in global display advertising on Android devices — though this is less assured.

At this point Android’s success has wildly exceeded Google’s most optimistic scenarios. In fact it’s so successful that Android is likely to become a target of regulatory and antitrust scrutiny at some point in the next couple of years.

Want to read more about The Mobile Web in general or Local Mobile Marketing in particular? Go here to our homepage: The Mobile Web is Made For Small Business.